The question is... why would you get a 99 ability? Theres no need to max some skill to 99 to play the game. Yes some end game PVM requires a couple of non-combat skills to be pretty large (not even close to 99 however ). Im now 109 battle (126 is max) on my primary with RuneScape gold, and all of my non-combat skills are 70 or lower, which is rather easy to achieve and large enough for pretty much everything I would like to do. Also im playing really casual. There are weeks that im not playing 1 hour. I do anything I was doing when I logged out and can progress and hop back in at any moment.
As you would like it to be it grindy. I have been playing OSRS since release and still do not have a single 99 skill since it's just not essential to appreciate - or be good at the game. This isn't like WoW, where your path is compact and everyone has the same goals. The battle system might be simple first glance but notably in PvP and endgame PvM, it can have a lot of depth and yes, it has a"skill ceiling". OSRS battle requires fast and exact clicking, which requires a ton more skill than tab targetting and spamming keyboard buttons to get rotations such as in WoW. I've never heard of this"bug" you're talking about. Because it's not necessary There's not any level climbing in PvP.
You can only attack players based on their combat level and your own. Low levels combat high levels and low levels and high degrees fight with. Yes, you are expected to get materials like food, potions and arrows to be able to pvp, what's so bad about it? There is build variation in PvP. You do not actually seem impartial enough to provide a reasonable assessment of OSRS and knowledgable. You seem like a bitter WoW fanboy that missed out on Runescape since it had"shit images" and is now badmouthing the match in an attempt to justify his bad decision and feel better about himself.
Read more: https://osrszone.com/osrs-crafting-guide-2019/
I feel somebody reminiscent of write this comment his time'wasted' about the game. I've seen folks who loved the sport state similar things, but most of what you've said paints you as equally ignorant and dumb because very frankly your primary beef with the game is really only a personal taste of game play.You can not call my observation that the game is only grinding an opinion. It is objectivly true, and not in a way that is great. Some one said that it is"as grindy because you would like it to be," and that I really had a chuckle out loud. That is true in the sense thatyes, I really could grind in the game. Or walk off and I could CHOOSE to turn the game off. What a decision? Preference might be a factor in my view; but there is at least one quantitative factor that can be used to measure a game's values, regardless of preferance.